USPTO serial 79085876
LANTIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4072465Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2011
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANTIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microprocessors; integrated circuit chips; semiconductors; telephones; portable telephones; software for microprocessors intended for telecommunication; firmware for microprocessors; downloadable electronic publications, namely, product briefs, manuals, technical disclosure bulletins, magazines on the subject of telecommunications, data sheets, and newsletters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, network communication services, home networking services, video-conferencing services, telephone communication services, and customer premises services, namely, consulting services in the field of customer premises telecommunication systems, equipment and telecommunication channels, analysis and quality assessment of customer premises telecommunication systems and equipment and telecommunication channels, consultation regarding improving the quality and efficiency of the telecommunication systems, equipment and channels, and consultation regarding the selection of telecommunications equipment and telecommunication channels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of telecommunication technology; design of microprocessors, integrated circuit chips and semiconductors; design of software for microprocessors intended for telecommunication; design of firmware for microprocessors; research and development in the field of electronics and telecommunication technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lantiq Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Lantiq Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Lantiq Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LANTIQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 17, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |