Drawing for SENSIBOT

USPTO serial 79085880

SENSIBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4192386Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2012
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSIBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J. MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LANEFOURTH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packaging machines; service robots for use in the beverage industry for equipping beverage crates with desired beverage containers, in particular beverage bottles, and for equipping pallets with beverage crates; service robots for use in distribution centers, in particular for picking, gathering, separating and sorting letters or parcels in a letter or parcel distribution center or a post office, and for picking, gathering, separating and sorting merchandise in a merchandise distribution center or a shop; service robots for use in agriculture for sowing seeds, for planting seedlings or plants, or for harvesting or picking fruit and vegetables; all mentioned service robots mobile or stationary; industrial robotsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; sensors for monitoring an industrial robot's or a service robot's area of motion, in particular optical sensors and tactile sensors; data-processing equipment and computers; software for controlling the movement of an industrial robot or a service robot by generating appropriate control signals for the robot, in particular software for receiving sensor signals depending on whether objects, human beings or animals have been detected within the robot's area of motion, and for generating control signals for the robot's motion according to the sensor signals, in particular for slowing down or stopping the robot's motion in case objects, human beings or animals have been detected within the robot's area of motion; image processing softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Development, design and maintenance of software, in particular control programs for use in the fields of measuring, controlling and regulating, in particular in the fields of automation technology and quality assurance; development, creation and maintenance of software for the control and/or regulation of handling apparatus, service robots, stationary or mobile robots and teleoperators, in particular robots and teleoperators with sensors for touch functions and visual display functions; development, design and maintenance of image processing software; development, creation and maintenance of image processing software for implementing visual display functions on handling apparatus, robots and teleoperators, in particular image processing software for image processing sensors on handling apparatus, robots and teleoperatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 9, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 14, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 22, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 22, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 21, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 22, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2011RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Oct 31, 2011RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2011RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 5, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 5, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 6, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2010RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance