Drawing for GOLF

USPTO serial 79085938

GOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4116698Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2012
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sepehr Daghighian

Sepehr Daghighian Hackler, Daghighian & Martino433 N Camden Drive, Fourth FloorBeverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely, handbags, sporting bags, rucksacks, purses, briefcases, score-card wallets, belts; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols, and walking sticksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear and headgear, namely, shirts, blouses, sweatshirts, sweaters, pullovers, cardigans, vests, jackets, robes, skirts, pants, slacks, shorts, overalls, rainwear, belts, gloves, socks; shoes, sandals, slippers, boots; caps, berets, hats, headbands, scarvesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2013PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Apr 1, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 28, 2013DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2013TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2013TRDEREQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION DENIED—
Feb 12, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2013ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 27, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 18, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance