USPTO serial 79085938
GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2012
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
Reutlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
Reutlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
Reutlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sepehr Daghighian
Sepehr Daghighian Hackler, Daghighian & Martino433 N Camden Drive, Fourth FloorBeverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely, handbags, sporting bags, rucksacks, purses, briefcases, score-card wallets, belts; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols, and walking sticks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear and headgear, namely, shirts, blouses, sweatshirts, sweaters, pullovers, cardigans, vests, jackets, robes, skirts, pants, slacks, shorts, overalls, rainwear, belts, gloves, socks; shoes, sandals, slippers, boots; caps, berets, hats, headbands, scarves | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
- Other trademarks owned by The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
- Other trademarks owned by The Golf Fashion Company, Inhaber Prodromos Tsarnos
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GOLF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2013 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | TRDE | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION DENIED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |