Drawing for PERLÉ

USPTO serial 79085999

PERLÉ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERLÉ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033wineSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 2, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 6, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance