USPTO serial 79086158
TURBOVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TURBOVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic databases stored on electronic storage media and downloadable electronic databases featuring digitally encoded data representing maps and other geographic information, electronic charts for marine, mountain, road and outdoor navigation recorded on electronic storage media, and instruments for marine, mountain, road and outdoor navigation in the nature of electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of a new computer software relating to the display of information in the field of navigation and recreation | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |