Drawing for JUHAO

USPTO serial 79086284

JUHAO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUHAO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lamps; vehicle lights; soldering lamps; acetylene flares; electric cooking utensils; lava rocks for use in barbecue grills; electric heating apparatus; extractor hoods for kitchen; electrical drier with a blower; hydrants; refrigerating apparatus and machines; electric heating apparatus for bathroom; electric radiators; disinfectant apparatus; disposable sterilization pouches; nuclear reactors; friction lighters for igniting gasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 19, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 7, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 28, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance