Drawing for CAN

USPTO serial 79086293

CAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thad Chaloemtiarana

Thad Chaloemtiarana Pattishall, McAuliffe, et al.311 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 5000Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and electronic components, namely, microchips, programed electronic components, semiconductors, and integrated circuits; electric and electronic measuring, control and regulating apparatus, namely, integrated circuits and semiconductors; computer programs for electronic data processingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 17, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 27, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance