USPTO serial 79086339
ONEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3968851Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2011
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
MILENA S. MISHEV DEMONT & BREYER, LLC100 COMMONS WAY STE 250HOLMDEL, NJ 07733UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Barbecues and grills; mobile kitchen island sinks; attachable wind shields as part of a barbecue or grill, namely, wind deflectors; hot plates; barbecue lids | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |