Drawing for MECAFLOW

USPTO serial 79086391

MECAFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4030479Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 27, 2011
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MECAFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for use in manufacturing processes of bakery products, namely, automatic industrial baking lines for bakery productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Cooking appliances and installations whether artisanal or industrial, namely, furnaces, bakers' ovens and continuous baking tunnel ovensSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 27, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 27, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 25, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance