Drawing for AUDIO CHI

USPTO serial 79086463

AUDIO CHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIO CHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; audio headphones, telephone headsets, audio devices, MP3 players, CD players, cassette players, audio digital tape recorders and players, audio disc recorders and players, audio amplifiers, turntables, computer software to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound function, audio speaker enclosures, audio speakers, cell phones, cell phone accessories, telephonesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 11, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 29, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 29, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance