USPTO serial 79086494
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |