USPTO serial 79086513
OC CONCEPT STORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OC CONCEPT STORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; business management assistance; business management and organization consulting; business management consulting; efficiency experts; business information; business inquiries; commercial information agencies; advertising agencies; dissemination of advertising matter; dissemination of advertising materials (including leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, newspapers and samples); rental of advertising space; rental of advertising time on all means of communication; publication of advertising texts; publicity columns preparation; updating of advertising material; on-line advertising on a computer network; advertising by mail order; sales promotion; document reproduction; administrative management of computer files; information retrieval from computer files; administrative management of publishing companies; presentations for commercial or advertising purposes of jewelry and clothing products, as well as items for the home and for the person on any communication media; retail sale services and assistance in the wholesale marketing of jewelry and clothing products, as well as items for the home and the person | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |