USPTO serial 79086518
CRYSTAL WHITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3930685Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2011
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRYSTAL WHITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Quirk
William H. Quirk Rosenthal Pauerstein Sandoloski Agather LLP755 E. MulberrySuite 200San Antonio, TX 78212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Light emitting diodes for the purpose of lighting for illuminating signage and advertisements; [ for illuminating rooms, buildings and streets; ] electric lamps; [ lights for chillers in the food industry; lights for canopy engine for multideck cabinets; lights for refrigerated multideck cabinets with doors in the food industry; ] light modules and lights with light emitting diodes as the means of lighting, namely, LED module chain for [ highlighting lines and edges and for backlighting complex contours, letters, symbols and surfaces in signage applications and in ] illuminated advertising applications for use as light fixtures; [ general lighting fixtures, effect and design lighting fixtures, emergency lighting fixtures, spot-lights, ceiling recessed light modules, floodlight modules, trunking light modules, floor recessed light modules, free standing light modules, surface mounted and recessed light modules, surface mounted and suspended light modules, suspended light modules, top-mounted light modules, wall mounted light modules, wall recessed light modules; ] sources of light including light emitting diodes, namely, light emitting diodes light fixtures | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |