USPTO serial 79086548
PMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4000582Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2011
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Gorenstein
CHARLES GORENSTEIN BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPP.O. BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Technical oils and greases, namely, industrial oils and greases; all purpose lubricants; industrial and vehicular lubricants; cutting oils; industrial lubricants, namely, cooling lubricants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |