USPTO serial 79086580
IP3 INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE PARTNERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IP3 INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE PARTNERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications information; providing access to computer programs in data networks; telecommunications; telecommunications via platforms and portals on the Internet; forwarding of information of all kinds to Internet addresses (Web messaging) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Consultancy concerning the providing of training and of further training as well as education, providing of training; providing electronic publications, not downloadable; coaching (education); demonstrative tuition with practical exercises; electronic desktop publishing; education and tuition; publication of texts, other than publicity texts; arranging and conducting of sporting and cultural events; publication of printed matter (also in electronic form), except for advertising purposes; publication of magazines and books in electronic form, also on the Internet; sporting and cultural activities; training; entertainment; organization of sports competitions; organization of competitions (education or entertainment); writing of texts, other than publicity texts; publication of books | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Updating of computer software; updating (update) of software; consultancy concerning telecommunications technology; computer consultancy services; consultancy concerning computer hardware; computer software consultancy; computer system analyses; EDP consultancy (computer services); design and development of computer hardware and computer software; industrial analysis and research services; installation and maintenance of software; installation of computer programs; scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Federation for Information Processing
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IP3 INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE PARTNERSHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 25, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |