USPTO serial 79086659
EUROPE 1400
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EUROPE 1400?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game and video game software; computer game programs and computer game software for video, computer, and Internet games and for electronic and visual games; computer game programs and computer game software for interactive games; computer game programs and computer game software for virtual reality games, interactive games, games for use with television, games for use with external display screen or monitor, games for use in competitions, games of chance and quiz games; computer game programs and computer game software for mobile telephones and wireless communications apparatus | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing on-line gaming services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable video games, computer games, interactive games, guessing games and games of chance, electronic games, Internet computer games, and computer game programs for mobile telephones and wireless communications apparatus via the Internet or a global network; providing on-line gaming services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable video games, computer games, interactive games, guessing games and games of chance, electronic games, Internet computer games and computer game programs via the Internet or a global network; providing online game competitions in the nature of video, electronic, interactive and Internet computer games; providing information relating to computer games and video games via the Internet and a global network and in electronic and computer-aided form; conducting, namely providing, alternate reality computer games via the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |