Drawing for ANTEIS

USPTO serial 79086734

ANTEIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4058093Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 22, 2011
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANTEIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Epstein

JEFFREY H. EPSTEIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNEW YORK, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Injectable dermal fillers for medical purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, ocular implants, implants consisting of artificial materials, surgical implants consisting of artificial materials, knives in the field of ophthalmology; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, injection pens; orthopedic articles, namely, visco supplement for joint injections in the nature of artificial implant material in gel form; suture materials; syringes for medical purposes; intraocular lenses; lenses in the nature of intraocular prostheses for surgical implantation; surgical implants comprising artificial tissue; ingestible implants consisting of hyaluronic acid based gel implants for injection, sold in a pre filled syringe, with or without a specially designed injection tool; injection syringes for medical, in particular dermatological and orthopedic purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 10, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 7, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 28, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 29, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 21, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 10, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 7, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 22, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 7, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance