USPTO serial 79086789
DOMINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOMINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
MARTIN W SCHIFFMILLER KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER PIERONI425 FIFTH AVENUE5TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016 2223Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, instant coffee and artificial coffee | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |