USPTO serial 79086821
MT METATRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3988040Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2011
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MT METATRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Anderson, Esq.
Gary M. Anderson, Esq. Fulwider Patton LLP111 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 1510Long Beach, CA 90802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, make-up powder, skin lotions, cosmetic creams; soaps, namely, toilet soap; dentifrices, namely, tooth paste; false nails; false eyelashes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |