Drawing for ISUBMIT

USPTO serial 79086881

ISUBMIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4040298Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 18, 2011
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISUBMIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Boutell

David G. Boutell FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Data-processing equipment and computers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Creating specialised software for documentation purposes in the healthcare sectorSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 17, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 29, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 29, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 18, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 30, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 25, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 15, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 15, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2017C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2012FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 18, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 2, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance