Drawing for LA VILLA REAL

USPTO serial 79087012

LA VILLA REAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4061949Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2011
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA VILLA REAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 29, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 10, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 10, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 29, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 13, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 5, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2018PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Dec 27, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2012FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 29, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 16, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance