USPTO serial 79087078
XTRAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4027629Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2011
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XTRAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | PIPES AND TUBES OF METAL, METAL SPIRAL HOSES FOR HYDRAULIC USE; FITTINGS OF METAL FOR METAL HYDRAULIC HOSES AND TUBES; MATERIALS OF METAL FOR RAILWAY TRACKS; NON-ELECTRIC CABLES AND WIRES OF COMMON METAL; IRON ORES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MANULI RUBBER INDUSTRIES S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MANULI RUBBER INDUSTRIES S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MANULI RYCO S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named XTRAFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |