USPTO serial 79087300
GO4GLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4036957Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2011
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GO4GLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
56068 Koblenz, DE
56068 Koblenz, DE
56068 Koblenz, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Lowe
David A. Lowe Lowe Graham Jones701 Fifth AvenueSuite 4800Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, detergent soaps, detergents prepared from petroleum, liquid washing agents, fabric softeners, washing powder, preformed washing powder agents, gel washing agents, surfactants, prewash compositions, laundry starch, organic detergents for laundry use; Cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; Soaps; Perfumery; Essential oils; Cosmetics; Hair lotions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 13, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 13, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |