USPTO serial 79087358
ENASOLAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENASOLAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Rectifiers; power supply devices for battery chargers; direct current converters; electric apparatus for charging batteries; electricity inverters; alternating current power apparatus; switch mode power supply apparatus (electric); switched mode power supply apparatus (electric); power controllers (electric); solar energy operating apparatus; uninterruptable power supply apparatus; battery charge monitors; battery chargers; current rectifiers; power supply devices (rectifiers); electrical apparatus for converting alternating current to direct current; electrical inverters; inverters (electricity); power controlling apparatus (electric) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |