USPTO serial 79087433
XL EXTRALIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4051380Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 2011
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XL EXTRALIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | [ Chairs; seats; tables being furniture; chairs for indoor and outdoor use ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | [ Non-slip bath tub mats; plastic bath mats ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Swim floats for recreational use; kick board flotation devices for recreational use; toys, namely, [ musical toys, mechanical toys, ride-on toys, ] squeeze toys, sandbox toys, plush toys, pull toys; toys for domestic pets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FINPROJECT S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FINPROJECT S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FINPROJECT S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FINPROJECT S.R.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named XL EXTRALIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 15, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |