Drawing for OXANONE

USPTO serial 79087489

OXANONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4008180Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 2011
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OXANONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye PC901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FlArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of chemical processes, namely, development of chemical production methods; development and design of chemical plants and installations; technical feasibility studies; services and counseling by engineers, chemists and physicists, namely, conducting engineering surveys, chemistry consultation; chemical laboratory services; [ chemical analyses; drawing up of expert technical reports by engineers, chemists or laboratory technicians in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; technical research in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; research on the subject of building construction and repair; research in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; inspection of chemical plants and installations; technical calculations in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; technical analyses of the production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; ] research in the field of the environmental protection; technical research for the studying of production processes in order to achieve technical optimization; development of plants and installations, namely, development of plants and installations for production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; adapting process technologies for plants and installations, namely, development of process technologies for plants and installations for production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor [ ; quality evaluation services, namely, tests to establish that the intended capacity of an installation or process, or the intended quality of the acquired product, is indeed achieved; quality control in order to achieve, maintain or improve quality ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 30, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 4, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 9, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 6, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 9, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 10, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 21, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 2, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance