USPTO serial 79087491
FAVOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4144644Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2012
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAVOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments, in particular surgical cannulas, intravenous cannulas, injection cannulas, cannulas for syringes; artificial limbs and orthopedic articles, namely, belts, braces, joint implants, supports | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research, in particular scientific research for medical purposes in the fields of esthetic, plastic and reconstructive medicine and surgery, dermatology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical services and hygienic and beauty care for human beings, in particular plastic surgery, esthetic dental procedures and esthetic services in the nature of microdermabrasion, namely, a topical skin treatment involving abrasion of the skin with a high-pressure flow of crystals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Gregor Wahl
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Gregor Wahl
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Gregor Wahl
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named FAVOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |