Drawing for ORTEC HARMONY

USPTO serial 79087553

ORTEC HARMONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORTEC HARMONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; business organization consultancySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and industrial research; computer programming; software developmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 26, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 31, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 10, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance