Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79087614?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79087614. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns GO FOR IT !?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79087614, the listed owner(s) include: OLIMP LABORATORIES Sp. z o.o., OLIMP LABORATORIES Sp. z o.o., OLIMP LABORATORIES Sp. z o.o..

What is USPTO serial number 79087614?

Serial number 79087614 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark GO FOR IT !. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover GO FOR IT !?

The public record lists International Classes: 016, 032, 035, 044. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 79087614

GO FOR IT !

Q: What is the current status of GO FOR IT !?

GO FOR IT ! (79087614) currently shows USPTO status code 404 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4405067Status 404

Filing date: Apr 7, 2010
Status date: Apr 7, 2020
Registration date: Sep 24, 2013
Examiner: JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office: POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GO FOR IT !?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

NANCY DWYER CHAPMAN LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE hase RDLACKENBACH SIGEL LLPSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
016	Calendars	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
032	Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, alcohol-free aperitifs, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; isotonic beverages; aromatized beverages based on fruit, protein, cordial, sugar and other fluid nutrients, namely, protein drinks for use as a food fillers and not for use as a meal replacement	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
035	Wholesale store services featuring printed matter, namely, calendars, nonalcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, alcohol-free aperitifs, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, isotonic beverages, aromatized beverages based on fruit, protein, cordial, sugar and other fluid nutrients, namely, protein drinks for use as a food fillers and not for use as a meal replacement, retail store services featuring printed matter, namely, calendars, nonalcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, alcohol-free aperitifs, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, isotonic beverages, aromatized beverages based on fruit, protein, cordial, sugar and other fluid nutrients, namely, protein drinks for use as a food fillers and not for use as a meal replacement, on-line wholesale store services featuring printed matter, namely, calendars, nonalcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, alcohol-free aperitifs, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, isotonic beverages, aromatized beverages based on fruit, protein, cordial, sugar and other fluid nutrients, namely, protein drinks for use as a food fillers and not for use as a meal replacement and on-line retail store services featuring printed matter, namely, calendars, nonalcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, alcohol-free aperitifs,non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, isotonic beverages, aromatized beverages based on fruit, protein, cordial, sugar and other fluid nutrients, namely, protein drinks for use as a food fillers and not for use as a meal replacement	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
044	Consultancy on medicine, consultancy on natural medicine, consultancy on pharmacy, consultancy on cosmetology	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 23, 2021	DENC	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED	—
Apr 23, 2021	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Sep 4, 2020	C71T	CANCELLED SECTION 71	—
Apr 25, 2019	ADCH	CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB	—
Sep 24, 2018	REM3	COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED	—
Jan 11, 2014	FINO	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Dec 24, 2013	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Dec 24, 2013	FIMP	FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	—
Dec 24, 2013	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Sep 24, 2013	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 30, 2013	GPNX	NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jul 9, 2013	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Jul 9, 2013	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2013	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Jun 19, 2013	OP2R	NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Jun 19, 2013	NONP	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	—
Jun 3, 2013	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jun 2, 2013	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jun 2, 2013	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Apr 22, 2013	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Feb 24, 2013	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Feb 24, 2013	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Feb 24, 2013	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Feb 1, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 31, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 31, 2013	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2012	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Aug 12, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2012	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 16, 2012	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Apr 16, 2012	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Apr 16, 2012	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Mar 21, 2012	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Mar 21, 2012	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Mar 9, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 9, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 6, 2012	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Feb 17, 2012	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Feb 17, 2012	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Feb 17, 2012	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Feb 17, 2012	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Nov 19, 2011	ADCH	CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB	—
Aug 18, 2011	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Aug 18, 2011	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2011	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 20, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 20, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2011	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jul 20, 2011	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 31, 2011	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2011	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2011	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2011	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Nov 21, 2010	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Nov 2, 2010	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Nov 2, 2010	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Nov 2, 2010	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Nov 1, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2010	MAFR	APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED	—
Oct 25, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 25, 2010	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Oct 21, 2010	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—