Drawing for CUVÉE ROSÉ CHAMPAGNE LAURENT-PERRIER  MAISON FONDÉE 1812 BY APPOINTMENT TO H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES PURVEYORS OF CHAMPAGNE CHAMPAGNE LAURENT-PERRIER LA CUVÉE ROSÉ EST NÉE EN 1968 DE L'AUDACE ET DU SAVOIR-FAIRE DE LA MAISON LAURENT-PERRIER. AVEC POUR EXI

USPTO serial 79087743

CUVÉE ROSÉ CHAMPAGNE LAURENT-PERRIER MAISON FONDÉE 1812 BY APPOINTMENT TO H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES PURVEYORS OF CHAMPAGNE CHAMPAGNE LAURENT-PERRIER LA CUVÉE ROSÉ EST NÉE EN 1968 DE L'AUDACE ET DU SAVOIR-FAIRE DE LA MAISON LAURENT-PERRIER. AVEC POUR EXI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4173399Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2012
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUVÉE ROSÉ CHAMPAGNE LAURENT-PERRIER MAISON FONDÉE 1812 BY APPOINTMENT TO H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES PURVEYORS OF CHAMPAGNE CHAMPAGNE LAURENT-PERRIER LA CUVÉE ROSÉ EST NÉE EN 1968 DE L'AUDACE ET DU SAVOIR-FAIRE DE LA MAISON LAURENT-PERRIER. AVEC POUR EXI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BREWSTER TAYLOR

BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1800 DIAGONAL ROADSUITE 325ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Champagne AOC wines being wines with protected appellation of originSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 7, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 22, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 22, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 17, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance