USPTO serial 79087762
6WINDGATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4000610Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2011
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with 6WINDGATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTIGNYLEBRETONNEUX, FR
BRETONNEUX, FR
BRETONNEUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
aoi nawashiro
aoi nawashiro Browdy and Neimark, PLLC1625 K Street, NW suite 550washington, DC, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and data; sound and data recording media, namely, blank CDs, blank DVDs; magnetic recording media, namely, blank magnetic tapes for tape recorders, blank magnetic disks; blank CD-ROMs for sound or video recording; electronic measuring and monitoring apparatus components, namely, digital transmitters, piezoelectric switches; data processers; computers and computer peripherals; telecommunication access equipment, namely, telephones; ] network routers; computer software for use in the fields of networking, telecommunication and security | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming; computer consulting; computer technology organization consulting; engineering services; network engineering services; professional consulting in the field of engineering; computer software design; scientific research, industrial research in the fields of networking, telecommunication and security; new product research and development for third parties, particularly, in the field of information technology; technical consulting in the field of information technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |