Drawing for STROS

USPTO serial 79087814

STROS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4036967Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 11, 2011
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
—

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with STROS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal ladders, prefabricated metal platforms in the nature of suspended metal catwalks, façade coverings in the nature of metal siding, partition walls of metal, prefabricated metal platforms in the nature of movable bed plates supporting a tower, scaffolding, or mast, where the bed plate can be repositioned horizontally along a track or chassis, all the above goods being metallicACTIVE—
007Bed plate assemblies consisting primarily of connecting machinery in the nature of electric motors for machines and also consisting of metallic bed plates, one or more metallic towers, scaffolding, or masts, and one or more horizontal platforms sold together as a unit where the motor is used to reposition bed plates along a track or chassis and to reposition platforms vertically along the height of the tower, scaffolding, or masts; elevators and freight elevators; climbing systems consisting primarily of industrial hoists and electric motors for machines and also consisting of free-standing metal scaffolding or metal scaffolding attached to a building, chimney, or tower, and a metallic cage used to hold persons or materials sold together as a unit where the electric motors for machines are used to raise and lower the cage along the height of the scaffolding; unloaders based on worm gears, namely, unloading cranesACTIVE—
037[ Rental, maintenance, and repair of building equipment in the nature of elevators and hoists, maneuvering bed plates, and building platforms in the nature of suspended metal catwalks ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 24, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 4, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 202271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 4, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 14, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 16, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 11, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 2, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance