Drawing for KIMSUFI

USPTO serial 79087864

KIMSUFI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4017847Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 30, 2011
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIMSUFI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R Menker

James R Menker Holley & Menker, PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ computer interfaces, computer software and computer programs for management of the client's accounts, sending and reception of fax by email, videosurveillance; reading devices for data processing, namely, scanners, fax machines; processors, namely, data processors, microprocessors, computer memories, computers, computer peripheral devices ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Computerized file management, compilation of information into computer databases, [ data search in online computer files, namely, providing searchable database featuring business information and business contacts containing a database of domain name information; rental of advertising space, rental of advertising time on communication media, publication of advertising texts, dissemination of advertising matter, on-line advertising on a computer network ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
036[ Electronic funds transfer; financial trust operations ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038[ Communication via computer terminals; television broadcasting; radio broadcasting; rental of telecommunication equipment ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Physical storage of electronically-stored data or documents [ ; freight forwarding; courier services ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041[ arranging and conducting educational conferences, colloquiums, seminars; practical training in fields of IT training services ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; duplication of computer programs; hosting the websites of others on a computer service for the global computer network; design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software; recovery of computer data; computer system design ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2023INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 1, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 11, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 30, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 5, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 31, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 25, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 25, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2017C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 25, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 30, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 14, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance