USPTO serial 79087897
EMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman B. Thot
Norman B. Thot Patent Law Offices of Dr. Norman B. ThotP.O. Box 10 17 56Ratingen, 40837GERMANYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine parts not for land vehicles, namely, electric drives, generators and electric motors, other than for land vehicles; electric motors and drives for mobile work machines; electric generators being parts for drive systems for mobile work machines, for floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Power supplies for electric machines; converters and inverters for power supply units; converters and inverters for electric motors, generators and electric actuators; elements for controlling electric motors, generators and electric actuators; measuring and monitoring apparatus in the nature of electric sensors for electric machines, electric motors, generators and electric actuators, cables, batteries, accumulators, plugs and fuses; electronic controls for motors and for engines for land vehicles, namely, controls for floor conveyors, fork-lift trucks and shovel loaders; drives for motors and for engines for land vehicles, namely, for floor conveyors, fork-lift trucks and shovel loaders; electrical apparatus, namely, charging stations for charging electric vehicles; electrical apparatus, namely charging stations for charging batteries for vehicles with electric drives; electric data processing installations and equipment in connection with the application and use of mobile work machines, floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders; computers and computer terminals for data processing for use with mobile work machines, floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders; pre-recorded machine-readable data carriers of all kinds containing programs for data processing for use with mobile work machines, floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders; computer programs for use in controlling converters and inverters; battery jump starters; signaling apparatus, namely, speed indicators; speedometers; fuel gauges | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Electric motors and drives for floor conveyors; fork lift trucks and shovel loaders; electric steering mechanisms for floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical consultancy in the field of engineering with regard to the design and use of electric motors, drives and actuators, in connection with the application and use of mobile work machines, floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders; technical consultancy in the field of engineering with regard to the design and use of controls and control elements for electric machines, electric motors and electric actuators, in connection with the application and use of mobile work machines, floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders; technical consultancy in the field of engineering with regard to the design and use of data processing installations and equipment and computers and programs, in in relation to mobile work machines, floor conveyors, fork lift trucks and shovel loaders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |