USPTO serial 79087940
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, not of metal, namely, flexible and safety bollards [ ; rigid pipes, not of metal; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; buildings, transportable, not of metal; monuments, not of metal ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods, not included in other classes, of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother of pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials or of plastics, namely, outdoor furniture ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |