USPTO serial 79088027
MSYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4011040Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2011
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MSYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard W. Kline
Howard W. Kline Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 S. West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Process indicators, namely, bar graph indicators and digital panel meters for displaying voltage, frequency, current, temperature, potentiometer, and strain gauge signals; electronic actuators; electronic valve actuators; voltage surge protectors; signal conditioners for industrial process control for instrumentation; electro-pneumatic converters; pneumatic-electro converters; power transducers for AC power lines; power monitors for AC power lines; electric communication protocol converters; remote control transmitters and receivers for process control devices controlled over computer networks; remote input/output units for computers, namely, transmitters and transceivers for connecting remote instruments, devices, data loggers, RTUs (remote terminal units), sensors, industrial automation equipment to PLCs (programmable logic controllers), HMIs (human-machine interfaces), DCSs (distributed control systems), and industrial or commercial LANs (local area networks); remote control telemetering machines and instruments; multiplex data transmission units, namely, multi-signal communication devices for data transmission; computer software and hardware for real-time measuring, transmitting, recording, logging and displaying of data; electronic data recorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |