Drawing for ENERGYLITE

USPTO serial 79088030

ENERGYLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4054572Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 15, 2011
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGYLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly Buck Richard

Molly Buck Richard Richard Law Group8411 Preston RoadSuite 890Dallas, TX 75225

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microprocessors, computer memories, microcontrollers, integrated circuits, semiconductorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 4, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 22, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 15, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance