Drawing for BIBA

USPTO serial 79088040

BIBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery; essential oils; preparations for cosmetic purposes; hair lotions; dentrifices; make-up removing preparations; astringents for cosmetic purposes; amber (perfume); aromatics (essential oils); breath freshening sprays; ethereal essences; eyebrow cosmetics; eyebrow pencils; soap for brightening textile; bath salts, not for medical purposes; cosmetic preparations for baths; beard dyes; pumice stone; skin whitening creams; bleaching preparations (decolorants) for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic creams; neutralizers for permanent waving; deodorants for personal use; disinfectant soaps; deodorant soaps; scented water; depilatory preparations; depilatory wax; hair dyes; cosmetic dyes; greases for cosmetic purposes; dental bleaching gels; geraniol; hair waving preparations; hair dyes; hair spray; shampoos; creams (cosmetic); cosmetic preparations for skin care; sun-tanning preparations (cosmetic); jasmine oil; adhesives for affixing false hair; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; eau de cologne; cosmetics; cosmetic kits; pencils (cosmetic); false nails; false eyelashes; lacquers (nail); lacquer-removing preparations; lavender oil; lavender water; lipsticks; lotions for cosmetic purposes; make-up; almond milk for cosmetic purposes; almond oil; almond soap; musk (perfumery); mouth washes, not for medical purposes; false nails; nail varnish; nail care preparations; oils for toilet purposes; oils for cosmetic purposes; waving preparations for hairs; oils for perfumes and scents; perfumes; pomades for cosmetic purposes; shaving preparations; shaving soap; after-shave lotions; cleansing milk for toilet preparations; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; make-up; make-up preparations; make-up powder; beauty masks; shampoos; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; swabs (toilets); cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; mascara; dental bleaching gelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 5, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 20, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance