Drawing for TMCS

USPTO serial 79088062

TMCS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4051392Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 8, 2011
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TMCS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beate Boudro

BEATE BOUDRO BEATE BOUDRO, ATTORNEY AT LAW4801 LANG AVE. NE, SUITE 110ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, mechanical devices and equipment for conveying and processing raw materials, mainly comprising loading machines, mobile transfer conveyors, belt conveyors, conveyor bridges and mobile conveyor bridges; mobile and semi-mobile crushing systems for comminuting raw materials, mainly comprising machines in the nature of transport crawlers, mechanical receiving hoppers, apron conveyors, crushing machines and discharge conveyors or pivoting stacker belt conveyors; belt conveyors, apron feeders, slope conveyors and steep incline conveyors, all being machines for handling bulk materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 15, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 21, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 15, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 15, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 8, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 7, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 8, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 23, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 18, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 11, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 18, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance