USPTO serial 79088163
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic massage creams, cosmetic massage oils and cosmetic massage lotions, cosmetic soaps, bath cream, bath gel and bath lotions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Adult sexual aids, vibrators and artificial penises | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Flower petals namely rose petals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |