USPTO serial 79088213
CHILLAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHILLAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Herbal teas (other than for medicinal use); preparations made from cereals; confectionery, snack foods including cereal derived food bars, grain based food bars, nutritional food bars, muesli bars, fruit bars, nut bars, energy bars, chocolate, chocolate bars, chocolate based products; all the foregoing including foods suitable for specific dietary requirements including for infants, gluten free, wheat free, egg free, dairy free, low glycaemic index, low fat, low salt, low joule, organic; nutritional supplements cereal based with added fruits; dietary food supplements cereal based with added fruits; dietary supplements cereal based with added fruits; food supplements cereal based with added fruits; concentrated carbohydrate food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; vegetable juices and predominantly fruit based smoothies; syrups and other preparations for making beverages; all the foregoing including beverages suitable for specific dietary requirements including for infants, gluten free, wheat free, egg free, dairy free, low glycaemic index, low fat, low salt, low joule, organic | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |