Drawing for ECT2

USPTO serial 79088234

ECT2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECT2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry and science, including the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industry, included in this class; chemical products for preserving and keeping food freshSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Body and beauty care cosmetics, hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations as well as preparations for medical use; dietetic foods adapted for medical useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 23, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 11, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance