Drawing for SOLITEC

USPTO serial 79088270

SOLITEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4014576Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 23, 2011
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SOLITEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Standley

Jeffrey S. Standley Standley Law Group LLP6300 Riverside DriveDublin, OH 43017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical coatings for coating surfaces of metal castings, grey cast iron and steel castings and to prevent moulding material reactions and metal reactions and casting defects, with a base of aluminium, magnesium and zircon silicates, for foundry moulds and cores of sand, metal and foamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 16, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 24, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 13, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 23, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2011CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 27, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 23, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 20, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 7, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 16, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2010RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance