Drawing for HYDROWORKS

USPTO serial 79088319

HYDROWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4033351Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 4, 2011
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDROWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas J. Gingo

Nicholas J. Gingo Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Ave.19th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Valves being parts of machines; hydraulic controls for machines and engines; hydraulic valves as parts of machines; pressure adjusting valves as parts of machines; electromagnetic valves as parts of machines; hydraulic elements other than for vehicles, namely, cylinders for motors and engines, cylinders being part of machines; hydraulic couplings for machines; hydraulic door openers and closers being parts of machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 4, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 2, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 28, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 4, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 4, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 16, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 16, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 16, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance