Drawing for TEOSYAL COSMECEUTICALS

USPTO serial 79088335

TEOSYAL COSMECEUTICALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3964626Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2011
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEOSYAL COSMECEUTICALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RdLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; cosmetic anti-aging products, namely, gels, creams, milks, masks, lotions; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, moisturizing gels, moisturizing creams, moisturizing milks, moisturizing masks, moisturizing lotions; skin cleansers, namely, preparations for cleaning the body and the face; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, preparations for cleaning, buffing and scouring the skinSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 7, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 10, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 29, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 21, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 1, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance