Drawing for THOR

USPTO serial 79088419

THOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4103619Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2012
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

Terrence J. McAllister Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle, LLPOne Landmark SquareTenth FloorStamford, CT 06901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Flexible pipes, not of metal; plastic flexible tubes; non-metal flexible hoses; pipe muffs, not of metal for use with rubber hoses and composition hoses; linkages of pipe not of metal, namely, non-metal sealing rings for use as connection seals; non-metal pipe gaskets, pipe connectors and pipe sleeves of plastic, namely, non-metal insulating pipe sleevesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 27, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 5, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 5, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 27, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 14, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 2, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 12, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2010LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance