USPTO serial 79088460
PETRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4133611Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2012
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PETRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-35040 Vighizzolo d'Este (PD), IT
Vighizzolo d'Este (PD), IT
I-35040 Vighizzolo d'Este (PD), IT
IT
I-35040 Vighizzolo d'Este (PD), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flour for professional use for restaurants, pizza makers, bakeries, confectioneries, and pastry stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOLINO QUAGLIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PETRA S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by MOLINO QUAGLIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PETRA S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by MOLINO QUAGLIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PETRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 4, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |