USPTO serial 79088486
PICOCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4211985Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2012
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICOCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | broadband wireless equipment, namely, telecommunications base station equipment for cellular and fixed networking and communications applications | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software, hardware and firmware design services; computer chip and processor design services; consultancy and advisory services in respect of data processors, computer chips and computer apparatus and equipment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mindspeed Technologies U.K., Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Picochip Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Intel Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PicoChip Designs Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PICOCHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 27, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |