USPTO serial 79088557
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate and products made from chocolate, biscuits, pastry and confectionery; edible ices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |