Drawing for LE TI ST BARTH

USPTO serial 79088619

LE TI ST BARTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE TI ST BARTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; precious metals and their alloys; jewelry cases or boxes of precious metal; cases; watch straps, chains, springs or glasses; key rings; statues or figurines (statuettes) of precious metal; cigar or cigarette cases of precious metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing; shirts; leather or imitation leather clothing; belts (clothing); underwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drink; bar services; food and drink cateringSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 23, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 13, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance